Top 10 Reasons Not to "Do" Iraq
by Ivan Eland
Director of Defense Policy Studies at the Cato Institute
August 19, 2002
Although
President Bush has not formally decided to invade Iraq, the emotional
chest pounding in the press by anonymous high-level civilian hawks
in his administration has reached a crescendo. And while the hawks
have made it seem unpatriotic to raise questions about such an invasion
since Sept. 11, a careful analysis suggests that such a high-testosterone
response should be avoided for 10 reasons:
1. High casualties may result at home or abroad. Secretary of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld admits that Iraq has biological and chemical weapons.
Faced with destruction of his regime (and possibly his own death),
Hussein would have every incentive to use them against U.S. forces,
Israel, oil fields, or even the U.S. homeland. If rag-tag al Qaeda
terrorists can operate on U.S. soil undetected over a number of
years, then more highly trained Iraqi intelligence agents might
be able to smuggle in chemical or biological weapons (and may be
already doing so). The U.S. military has been unenthusiastic about
undertaking an invasion of Iraq because of fears of high casualties
from urban fighting or from such Iraqi weapons of mass destruction.
2.
Occupation of an Islamic country by the United States could be a
recruiting poster for Islamic terrorists. We should remember the
worldwide mobilization of Islamic radicals to fight the Soviets
in Afghanistan. An invasion of Iraq would play right into al Qaeda's
hands. Terrorists hope for an excessive, intrusive response by their
adversary so that they can recruit more supporters.
3.
Invading and occupying Iraq would distract the U.S. government from
the vital task of destroying an enemy that has actually attacked
the U.S. homeland--al Qaeda. U.S. intelligence agencies apparently
have no hard evidence that links Iraq to the Sept. 11 attacks. How
is an unprovoked U.S. invasion of Iraq, without international support,
is relevant to the legitimate war against America's terrorist adversaries.
4.
The threat from Iraq is exaggerated. Other despotic countries have
or are seeking weapons of mass destruction (Syria, Libya, North
Korea, Iran, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia), have invaded their neighbors
(Syria, Libya, and North Korea), and even used chemical weapons
(Libya in Chad during the 1980s). Moreover, Iraq's military has
been devastated by the Gulf War and a decade of sanctions. Americans
should ask why the United States -- half a world away -- is more
concerned about the Iraqi threat than are Iraq's neighbors.
5.
The terrorists groups that Iraq supports do not focus their attacks
on the United States. Such groups concentrate their attacks on targets
in the Middle East.
6.
Although unsatisfying, the U.S.-led containment policy has worked.
If the United States could successfully contain a superpower (USSR)
for more than 40 years until it fell from within, it can continue
to contain the dictator of a small, poor nation until he dies or
is overthrown.
7.
A U.S. invasion of Iraq could destabilize or topple friendly governments
in Turkey, Jordan, Egypt, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. Enflamed Islamic
populations could rise up against those regimes, which are closely
aligned with the United States.
8.
The United States might be isolated diplomatically or have to expend
large amounts of diplomatic capital to gain support for the invasion.
The aforementioned friendly Islamic nations -- many of whose territories
would be needed to launch any invasion -- and the European allies
are almost universally unenthusiastic about such a military operation.
The United States had to offer Turkey about $5 billion in debt forgiveness
and other financial inducements to obtain even reluctant Turkish
support for a U.S. attack on Iraq.
9.
At a time of economic sluggishness and of red ink for the U.S. government,
an invasion and long-term occupation of Iraq could cost billions
of dollars, bust the budget and throw the U.S. economy into a tailspin.
The Gulf War Cost $80 billion (in 2002 dollars). Because the United
States would probably be faced with a long occupation of Iraq to
stabilize the country after the invasion, the cost is likely to
be higher this time around. And unlike the Gulf War, no financial
support from other nations can be expected to defray the costs.
10.
The threat of war in the Middle East or a loss of production from
actual combat could cause the world price of oil to skyrocket. Fighting
in Iraq could reduce oil production there, as could any Iraqi attack
on the Kuwaiti and Saudi oilfields using missiles armed with weapons
of mass destruction.
After sober analysis, one must conclude that the civilian political
appointees in the administration should stop the tub-thumping for
war and listen to counsels of restraint by those in the military
who would have to fight and die in such a war. Hussein's survival
in the 11 years after the Gulf War--combined with his demonization
by three U.S. administrations--has led many to overstate the threat
that despot presents and understate the costs of scrapping the containment
policy that has contained him effectively.
PREVIOUS
PAGE |
NEXT PAGE
|